<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology - Trotzendorff</title>
	<atom:link href="https://trotzendorff.de/tag/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://trotzendorff.de</link>
	<description>Running over sticks and stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 11:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">72357874</site>	<item>
		<title>When Silence Becomes Signal</title>
		<link>https://trotzendorff.de/psychology/when-silence-becomes-signal/</link>
					<comments>https://trotzendorff.de/psychology/when-silence-becomes-signal/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotzendorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 11:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://trotzendorff.de/?p=53876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, I posted on LinkedIn that my current role is coming to an end and that I’m exploring what’s next. The response was generous. Messages. Comments. Encouragement. The kind of digital warmth that makes you believe platforms can still be relational spaces. And then, as always, the curve flattened. Which is normal. Attention spikes and fades. That’s how feeds work. But I noticed something subtle: I began to hesitate before opening LinkedIn. Not because I feared missing something. Because I feared there would be nothing. That small pause — that fraction of a second before tapping the icon — felt strangely revealing. It was weird. The Fear of Non-Response We’ve become fluent in the language of FOMO — the fear of missing out. The concept was formally defined by Andrew K. Przybylski and colleagues as »a pervasive apprehension that others might be having rewarding experiences from which one is absent«. But what I felt was almost the opposite. It was the fear of non-response. What if no one commented today? What if &#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://trotzendorff.de/psychology/when-silence-becomes-signal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">53876</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not AI Is the Threat — People Are</title>
		<link>https://trotzendorff.de/psychology/not-ai-is-the-threat-people-are/</link>
					<comments>https://trotzendorff.de/psychology/not-ai-is-the-threat-people-are/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotzendorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 08:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://trotzendorff.de/?p=53829</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[»I tend to think that most fears about A.I. are best understood as fears about capitalism.« When I read that line from Ted Chiang recently, it landed because it pulls the mask off the monster. A lot of what we call »fear of AI« is really fear of incentives: who funds the systems, who deploys them, who benefits when they scale, and who gets hurt when they fail. Still, I don’t think »capitalism« is the final layer of the explanation. Capitalism doesn’t appear out of nowhere like weather. It’s a set of rules, norms, and defaults people agree on (or tolerate) and then keep reinforcing. Depending on how those rules are written and enforced, you get very different outcomes: extractive versions that squeeze people, and constructive versions that build real value. Either way, it’s a human project. So if we keep pushing the question back — who shaped the incentives, who chose the trade-offs, who decided what counts as »efficient« — we end up at the same place: people. That framing matters because we talk &#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://trotzendorff.de/psychology/not-ai-is-the-threat-people-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">53829</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do the Homework Before the Hype</title>
		<link>https://trotzendorff.de/running/do-the-homework-before-the-hype/</link>
					<comments>https://trotzendorff.de/running/do-the-homework-before-the-hype/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotzendorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://trotzendorff.de/?p=53803</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There’s something mildly absurd about modern running tech. Every brand talks about AI now. Smart coaching, predictive training plans, readiness scores, recovery scores, stress scores, you name it. My watch apparently knows my future. It just doesn’t know what happened five minutes ago. Take heart rate. I run with a chest strap or the wrist sensor, doesn’t matter. Every now and then the data goes completely off the rails. Suddenly my pulse jumps to 190 while I’m jogging easy, stays there for three minutes, then drops back like nothing happened. No hill, no sprint, no drama. Just noise. Same with GPS. Clean route along the river, then one glitch and the track cuts straight through buildings like I teleported. The device shrugs and saves it as truth. I can live with imperfect sensors. Sweat, movement, bad satellite reception — physics is messy. What I don’t get is why all that so-called intelligence doesn’t clean up the mess afterwards. Because statistically speaking, this is the easy part. Outliers are not some exotic phenomenon. They’re textbook stuff. &#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://trotzendorff.de/running/do-the-homework-before-the-hype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">53803</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>«Running is about finding joy in the journey»</title>
		<link>https://trotzendorff.de/running/running-is-about-finding-joy-in-the-journey/</link>
					<comments>https://trotzendorff.de/running/running-is-about-finding-joy-in-the-journey/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotzendorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trail running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://trotzendorff.de/?p=39031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the world of running, trends come and go, but some have the power to shape the future of the sport. From the growing focus on recovery and self-care to the controversial debate around trail running and mega events, there is no shortage of topics to explore. In this interview with ChatGPT*, a cutting-edge AI language model, we delve into the latest trends and hot-button issues in running, and discuss the potential impact of technology on performance optimization. But beyond the data and analytics, we also touch on a more fundamental question: what does it mean to find joy in running, and how can we strike a balance between the pursuit of excellence and the intrinsic value of the sport? Join us on this thought-provoking journey into the heart of running, and discover what the future might hold for this enduring passion. Trotzendorff: Hey, can we do an interview? ChatGPT: Hello! Of course, I’d be happy to do an interview with you. What kind of interview are you interested in? I’d love to talk to &#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://trotzendorff.de/running/running-is-about-finding-joy-in-the-journey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">39031</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three running gadgets and technologies that cought my attention lately</title>
		<link>https://trotzendorff.de/running/three-running-gadgets-and-technologies-that-cought-my-attention-lately/</link>
					<comments>https://trotzendorff.de/running/three-running-gadgets-and-technologies-that-cought-my-attention-lately/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotzendorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motesque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omorpho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whoop]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://trotzendorff.de/?p=25036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While it’s true you don’t need any tech or gadgets to run, there are a lot of them out there that are fun to use or can provide you with data, motivating insights or that can enrich your workout. I’ve come across three gadgets and new technologies lately that caught my attention — and that I’d like to briefly introduce to you. Whoop 4.0 Description: the Whoop 4.0 is a fitness tracker that collects data about recovery, strain and sleep performance. «From these figures, it offers advice on how you should balance your training and rest to achieve peak athletic performance,» Harry Bullmore writes on LiveScience. What sounds like any other fitness tracker on the market, has its USPs: the band itself is screenless, IP68 dustproof and water-resistant at depths of up to 10 meters for two hours. The lack of GPS might be another con for some of us, but on the data sight the Whoop is showing off, as «it is the multi-dimensional approach to calculating recovery that is the jewel in the &#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://trotzendorff.de/running/three-running-gadgets-and-technologies-that-cought-my-attention-lately/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25036</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>«I made a horrible choice»: How a blogger discovered a runner cheating in a half-marathon</title>
		<link>https://trotzendorff.de/running/i-made-a-horrible-choice-how-a-blogger-discovered-a-runner-cheating-in-a-half-marathon/</link>
					<comments>https://trotzendorff.de/running/i-made-a-horrible-choice-how-a-blogger-discovered-a-runner-cheating-in-a-half-marathon/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotzendorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 08:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Half Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Races]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strava]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://trotzendorff.de/?p=23773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[«I think most people aren’t aware of how much cheating goes on in marathons.» Were you aware? I wasn’t. But Derek Murphy, an independent marathon investigator, should know. He recently took particular care to examine the case of Jane Seo, a food and fitness writer in New York City. She finished second among the women in Sunday’s Fort Lauderdale Half Marathon in 1 hour and 21 minutes, a blazing 6:15 mile. But she cheated. As an initial indication Derek found out, that Seo’s pace during the first 10 kilometers was 7:09 per mile, but during the last 11.08 kilometers, it increased tremendously to 5:25 per mile. He then turned to her account on Strava to have a closer look at certain details. And last but not least he observed in official post-race photos that a fitness tracking watch was wrapped around Seo’s wrist, displaying close to the proper time, but the incorrect mileage. Seo had skipped about a mile and a half of the race and rode her bike along the course later in the &#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://trotzendorff.de/running/i-made-a-horrible-choice-how-a-blogger-discovered-a-runner-cheating-in-a-half-marathon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23773</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast-Tipps: 10 Empfehlungen, die aus der Masse hervorstechen</title>
		<link>https://trotzendorff.de/wort-und-tat/podcast-tipps-10-empfehlungen-die-aus-der-masse-hervorstechen/</link>
					<comments>https://trotzendorff.de/wort-und-tat/podcast-tipps-10-empfehlungen-die-aus-der-masse-hervorstechen/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotzendorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Wort & Tat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://krikkit.uber.space/?p=21766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tag für Tag zur Arbeit zu pendeln — in meinem Fall von Köln nach Düsseldorf — hat nicht gerade viele Vorteile. Einer aber ist, dass ich mir dadurch die Zeit nehme, regelmäßig Podcasts zu hören. Mehr zumindest als es sonst wohl der Fall wäre. Genug ist es trotzdem nie, es gibt einfach zu viele gute Produktionen da draußen, und es werden immer mehr. Ein Grund, sich gar nicht erst mit diesem Thema zu beschäftigen, ist das natürlich nicht. Und so habe ich mal gesammelt, was ich gerne höre, welche Podcasts mir Verspätungen, überfüllte Abteile, Armlehnen-Besetzer*innen und Deo-Ignorant*innen und sogar den täglichen Halt in Leverkusen versüßen. Allison Behringer: »The Intern« Ich habe mich entschieden, vorne anzufangen. Mit dem Podcast, der sozusagen meine Einstiegsdroge war. Und der bis jetzt eine der besten Audioproduktionen ist, die ich gehört habe. Dass Allison Behringers »The Intern« so gut ist, hat dabei mehrere Gründe. Zum einen hat Allison eine echte Geschichte zu erzählen, die von ihrem Einstieg in die Arbeitswelt handelt, von ihren ersten Schritten in New York — und davon, &#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://trotzendorff.de/wort-und-tat/podcast-tipps-10-empfehlungen-die-aus-der-masse-hervorstechen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21766</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Das Foto deines Lebens</title>
		<link>https://trotzendorff.de/visionen/das-foto-deines-lebens/</link>
					<comments>https://trotzendorff.de/visionen/das-foto-deines-lebens/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotzendorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2017 18:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Visionen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digitalisierung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotografie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identität]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inszenierung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kultur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://krikkit.uber.space/?p=21185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eine App, die mich deshalb so begeistert, weil ich sie auf absehbare Zeit wohl nicht nutzen werde? Die gibt es. Und sie verrät uns einiges über unsere Nutzung digitaler Medien. »Und plötzlich entsteht das Foto meines Lebens …« Eine Frau, die sonst nicht im Leben daran denken würde, ungeschminkt und ohne das perfekte Outfit vor die Öffentlichkeit zu treten, lacht glückselig in die Kamera — ungeschminkt und alles andere als im perfekten Outfit. Es ist ein Moment im Januar 2017, kurz nachdem die brasilianische Instagrammerin Thaise de Mari ihre Tochter per Kaiserschnitt zur Welt gebracht hat. Das Selfie aus dem Kreißsaal erntet Likes, aber auch einen Shitstorm. Doch es kann auch zum Nachdenken anregen. »Und plötzlich entsteht das Foto meines Lebens — ohne Produktion, ohne hohe Auflösung, und ohne Sorgen um Haare, Make-up oder den richtigen Winkel!«, schrieb Thaise zu dem Bild. Das »Foto meines Lebens« also. Was ist das? Und: Welches wäre das Foto meines Lebens? Diese Frage haben sich auch Michael Meyer, Markus Riegel und Joachim Fröstl gestellt — und daraus eine App &#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://trotzendorff.de/visionen/das-foto-deines-lebens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21185</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give me a ping, Vasili — one ping only, please</title>
		<link>https://trotzendorff.de/wort-und-tat/give-me-a-ping-vasili-one-ping-only-please/</link>
					<comments>https://trotzendorff.de/wort-und-tat/give-me-a-ping-vasili-one-ping-only-please/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotzendorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Wort & Tat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://krikkit.uber.space/?p=19350</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Man sollte meine, das sei eine einfache Sache mit diesen Push-Mitteilungen: an oder aus. Aber das ist es nicht, obwohl wir uns damit jetzt schon ein paar Jahrzehnte rumschlagen. Ein Lösungsversuch. Push-Notifications: Ein kleiner Trigger für unser Belohnungssystem Dieses Dopamin ist ein ganz feiner, kleiner Stoff. In bestimmten Situationen dockt er&#160;an Rezeptoren im&#160;mesolimbischen System an — dem »Belohnungssystem« unseres Hirns. Das Ergebnis: Wir fühlen uns gut. Das Besondere: Um dieses Belohnungssystem zu triggern, müssen wir gar nichts Großartiges vollbringen, wir müssen keinen Berg besteigen und keinen Marathon laufen, nicht im Lotto gewinnen und keinen guten Sex haben. Es genügt, eine Mail zu beantworten. Manchmal sind es die kleinen Dinge, die uns zufrieden machen. »Multitasking is not a skill to add to the resume, but rather a bad habit to put a stop to. Turn off notifications, create set email checking time slots throughout the day (rather than constant inbox refreshing), and put your mind to the task at hand.« Larry Kim: »Multitasking is Killing Your Brain« Was auf den ersten Blick nach einer riesigen Chance &#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://trotzendorff.de/wort-und-tat/give-me-a-ping-vasili-one-ping-only-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19350</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Die Snapchat-Falle</title>
		<link>https://trotzendorff.de/visionen/die-snapchat-falle/</link>
					<comments>https://trotzendorff.de/visionen/die-snapchat-falle/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trotzendorff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Visionen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://krikkit.uber.space/?p=19245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Uns Journalisten muss man ja nur oft genug sagen, irgendwas werde Trend und wenn wir nicht dabei seien, gingen wir unter — und schon fangen wir an es zu glauben und hektisch zu reagieren. 2016 also Snapchat. Doch ist das alles wirklich so einfach? Und werden 2016 wirklich alle Medien snappen? Um es kurz zu machen: nein. Um es etwas länger zu machen: Es ist kompliziert. Das fängt schon bei Snapchat selbst an, auch wenn Martin Giesler (Artikel nicht mehr online) schreibt, die App sei total intuitiv: »Foto oder Video aufnehmen, sich damit kreativ austoben und wahlweise an einen Freund schicken oder in eine Story packen, die dann 24 Stunden lang abrufbar ist.« Doch schon das stimmt so nicht. »Snapchat is not easy. You can’t just throw up some links like on Twitter and Facebook and call it a day. You have to understand Snapchat and know how to use it the right way.« Chris Snider Vergangenes Wochenende war in München DLD, nach Ansicht nicht Weniger eine der wichtigsten Digital-Konferenzen Deutschlands. Zumindest aber eine, auf &#8230;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://trotzendorff.de/visionen/die-snapchat-falle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19245</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
