All posts filed under: Science

Hand holding a smartphone against a dark background, displaying a folder of social media apps including LinkedIn, Snapchat, Pinterest, Twitter, Telegram, Messenger, Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

When Silence Becomes Signal

A few weeks ago, I post­ed on LinkedIn that my cur­rent role is com­ing to an end and that I’m explor­ing what’s next. The response was gen­er­ous. Mes­sages. Com­ments. Encour­age­ment. The kind of dig­i­tal warmth that makes you believe plat­forms can still be rela­tion­al spaces. And then, as always, the curve flat­tened. Which is nor­mal. Atten­tion spikes and fades. That’s how feeds work.

Inequality is a Choice—And We Keep Making the Wrong One

In three weeks, Ger­many will vote. When I decide where to place my vote, one thing mat­ters most: Which par­ty rep­re­sents a vision of soci­ety that acknowl­edges a fun­da­men­tal truth—who we become is large­ly shaped by cir­cum­stances beyond our con­trol. Our intel­li­gence, resilience, and tal­ents may feel per­son­al, but they are, to a sig­nif­i­cant extent, the result of fac­tors we nev­er chose: our genet­ics, the qual­i­ty of our edu­ca­tion, the finan­cial secu­ri­ty of our par­ents, the coun­try we were born in. Even our abil­i­ty to work hard and per­se­vere is shaped by ear­ly child­hood expe­ri­ences and social conditioning.

Why Emotional Intelligence Doesn’t Exist — Or Does It?

In a 2015 sur­vey, 72 per­cent of employ­ees ranked «respect­ful treat­ment of all employ­ees at all lev­els» as the top fac­tor in job sat­is­fac­tion. That’s no big sur­prise, but what exact­ly does it mean for orga­ni­za­tions and man­agers? One sim­ple answer could be: hire more employ­ees with a high Emo­tion­al Intel­li­gence Quo­tient (EQ), enabling them to under­stand and man­age their own and oth­ers’ emo­tions. How­ev­er, mea­sur­ing EQ is not as straight­for­ward as it may seem, and the con­cept of Emo­tion­al Intel­li­gence itself has been sub­ject to sci­en­tif­ic scruti­ny and criticism.

The Mystery of Statistica: What the Owl Can Tell Us About an Enigmatic Paradox

Once upon a time in the enchant­i­ng land of Sta­tis­ti­ca, there were two groups of ani­mals: the Crows and the Fox­es. The ani­mals in this land were known for their excep­tion­al skills in play­ing two very pop­u­lar games: Feath­erball and Fur­ball. The Crows and Fox­es loved to com­pete against each oth­er, and every year, they would gath­er to par­tic­i­pate in the Grand Sta­tis­ti­ca Tournament.

Navigating the Landscape of Identity: How Our Past Can Shape Our Future

Have you ever stopped to won­der just how many iden­ti­ties you’ve embraced through­out your life? Yes­ter­day I found myself wan­der­ing through the aisles of my uni­ver­si­ty’s library, a place I had­n’t vis­it­ed in 17 years since the end of my first degree. As I strolled past the rows of books, I could­n’t help but rem­i­nisce about my past selves: the eager stu­dent, the bicy­cle couri­er, the bud­ding jour­nal­ist. Through­out my life, I have effort­less­ly shed and adopt­ed new iden­ti­ties like a chameleon chang­ing its col­ors. Some­times with­out notic­ing, often with­out think­ing about it. And at times, I may have left behind some iden­ti­ties too hasti­ly, with­out ful­ly appre­ci­at­ing the lessons and expe­ri­ences they offered.